Vaishvik Hindu Rashtra Mahotsav (2024) Day 6 : Justice and the Constitution

The verdict of the Dabholkar murder case was already decided by the court and the investigating agencies! – Advocate Prakash Salsingikar, High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra

The Dabholkar murder case was different from other cases. The conduct of the court and the investigating agencies suggests that they had already decided what the outcome (verdict) would be. We are going to challenge the punishment awarded by the Pune District Sessions Court to two accused in the High Court. Prakash Salsingikar, an advocate in the Dr Dabholkar murder case, expressed his firm opinion that these two accused will be acquitted. He was speaking on the sixth day of the Vaishvik Hindu Rashtra Mahotsav (2024). On this occasion, Bombay High Court Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay, Sanatan’s seeker Vikram Bhave and devout Hindu MLA from Telangana Raja Singh Lodh were present on the dais.

Advocate Salsingikar said,
1. When I got this case, I thought, this is an opportunity to fight for my thoughts. The Chief Investigating Officer of the Dabholkar murder case S.R. Singh had a set of documents with him when he testified, but during his cross questioning the set had suddenly disappeared. At that time, the court hall was packed. When questioned about these documents S.R. Singh responded in a highhanded manner. So it took a long time to find it. When they were finally found, it was found that some of the papers were missing. The prosecution side was given more time in this case, while we were given less time. Overall, there were several incidents where partiality was on display in court.
2. A witness was testifying. Then he was asked, did anyone teach you how to testify? At the same time, a person was seen getting up and running from the court hall. The witness then looked at the fleeing person and said that he was the one who taught me to testify. That person was an official of the Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmulan Samiti. The judge took this very casually. UAPA (Unlawful Offenses [Prevention] Act) was imposed on the accused in this case. It was wrong to apply this law to single murder.

I will try to get CBI investigation officer Subhash Ramroop Singh punished! – Vikram Bhave, Seeker of Sanatan Sanstha

CBI investigating officer Subhash Ramrup Singh arrested me on trumped up charges. Singh told me that he is arresting me in a different case in another state. Subhash Ramrup Singh filed a charge sheet against me. I applied for bail, but my bail application was rejected. I was denied bail by falsely stating that I was accused of terrorism earlier. So I had to spend 2 years in prison even though I had not committed any crime. Later the court acquitted me. It was proved in the court that I was kept in prison for 2 years when there was no mistake on my part. CBI investigating officer Subhash Ramroop Singh vindictively wronged me. I will try to get Subhash Ramroop Singh punished.

A movement will be launched to bring in judicial reforms! – Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay, President, Lawyers for Just Society, Mumbai

The Dabholkar murder case is a murder case, but all investigating agencies give it a different twist. The case was brought to trial with the sole intention of implicating seekers of Sanatan. These agencies tried to move this case forward in the same direction. The case was being investigated under some great pressure. In such instances, the judge cannot be impartial. The High Court was keeping a close watch on this matter. That’s why everyone was under pressure. A charge sheet was filed in this case, but there were contradictions in it. The matter was dragged on by the court for many years and Sanatan’s seekers had to bear the agony, besides causing immeasurable damage to Sanatan Sanstha’s image. In view of this, a movement will be launched to bring in judicial reforms, devout Hindu Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay announced.

Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay further said that today there is a battle between the Hindus and the non-Hindus in the court. Naxal and Communist munded judges want to live in luxury. They are not bound by Dharma, Culture or Propriety. These judges have absolutely no knowledge of Dharma.

Today’s Naxalite and Communist minded judges want to live in luxury. They are not bound by religion, culture or limitations. These judges have no knowledge of religion. If a judge has knowledge of Jurisprudence, Limitation, Dharmashastra, Dharma-Adharma, then he can judge properly. The ‘ecosystem’ of anti-nationals and anti-religious people is very effective. It is important to prove your pressure group to deal with it. If judges are well versed in law, propriety, dharmashastras, dharma-adharma, then they will be able to deliver justice. The ecosystem of anti-nationals and anti-Dharmik people is very influential. We need a pressure group of our own to counter them.

Need to work together for Hindu Rashtra! – Advocate Sanjiv Punalekar, Secretary, Hindu Lawyers Council

Vikram Bhave, Dr Virendrasingh Tawde and I were acquitted in the Dr Dabholkar case. But the punishment handed down to Sharad Kalaskar and Sachin Andure is unjust. We will approach the high court against this. We believe that their innocence will be proved in the High Court. This false case was propped up to stop the activities of Hindu organisations. But we will not stop the work of Hindutva because of this. Some politicians tried to deceive the Hindus for power. It is due to selfish politics that the Hindus are getting divided. A politician who insulted Ma Saraswati Devi was inducted in the Maharashtra Cabinet. There are such selfish leaders in every political party. Advocate Sanjiv Punalekar said that there is a need for Hindus to unite and work for Hindu Rashtra. Advocate Punalekar addressed the Vaishvik Hindu Rashtra Mahotsav via video.