‘P M Ahmad’ writes an article creating hatred against Sanatan Sanstha and Sanatan Prabhat

Ashadh Krushnapaksha Shashthi, Kaliyug Varsha 5115

Cunning fanatics try to target Hindus using Gandhi’s principles!

Sir Sayyad Ahmad had stated that ‘More than Gandhi, I like a Muslim who has committed 100 offenses’. One should therefore, ask Ahmad that since when fanatics started liking Gandhi? If Ahmad really likes Gandhi, he should show guts to speak against fanatic leaders who indulge in mud-slinging at Gandhi. Hindus are aware of the strategy of cunning fanatics to use Gandhi for targeting Hindus !  

Kottayam (Kerala): P. M. Ahmad has accused that Mohandas Gandhi has been insulted in the issue published by Hindu-terrorist organization, Sanatan Sanstha, for July 2013 in English, in an article written by Dr. K. V. Seetharamaih by referring to him as sinful, wicked and a very bad person. (Dr. K. V. Seetharamaih has written a few books exposing anti-national activities of Gandhi after proper research. There is no ban on these books anywhere in India. He gives information from these books in public programs. He had given similar information during the all-India Hindu Convention held at Goa which was published by ‘Sanatan Prabhat’. It does not, however, mean that it is also the opinion of Sanatan Prabhat. If Ahmad had any objection about the same, he should have directly contacted Seetharamaih; but instead, he is clamoring against Sanatan exhibiting his immaturity. Also, Sanatan Sanstha has not been accused as a terrorist organization by any investigating agency or Court; still Ahmad referring to Sanatan Sanstha as a terrorist organization, shows his mentality. Ahmad has defamed Sanatan Prabhat through his article; therefore, Sanatan Prabhat is seeking legal advice from advocates ! – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat)       

In a periodical titled ‘Tejas’ from Kerala, Ahmad’s article has been published in the periodical’s Thiruvanathpuram edition. Ahmad has stated that in Dr. K. V. Seetharamaih’s article, Seetharamaih has said that Nathuram Godse, in the form of Bhagavan Srikrushna, had slain Gandhi for establishment of ‘Dharma’. (Ahmad should first shut mouths of fanatic leaders who are spitting venom against Gandhi and then dare to question pro-Hindu activists ! – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat)

  1. Ahmad has mentioned in his article, the following sentences from Dr. Seetharamaih’s published speech, wherein it is written ‘Gandhi was anti-national and anti-Hindus. It is necessary to destroy ideology of Gandhi for establishment of Hindu Rashtra. Seekers’ protection and destruction of evil, is the history of Hindus. Gandhi believed in non-violence. He did not accept the ideology as prescribed by Dharma. (Dr. Seetharamaih is always ready to discuss about the thoughts presented by him. If Ahmad has any problem with his way of thinking, he should contact Dr. Seetharamaih ! – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat)
  2. Ahmad writes further that ‘in the monthly ‘Sanatan Prabhat’, speeches have been published from the second world Hindu Convention. (The second Hindu Convention was not world level; but it was held at all-India level. Ahmad does not even know it and he claims that Sanatan Sanstha is a terrorist organisation. – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat) These speeches are anti-national, causing communal disharmony. (It has been more than a month since the Convention was held; but there is no news about the speeches creating communal tension anywhere. Ahmad is looking at them through his racism; therefore, he thinks all are racists like him. – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat)
  3. Hindu Janajagruti Samiti is a branch of Sanatan Sanstha which is creating controversy over the issue of ‘love jihad’ causing tension in Kerala, accuses Ahmad in this article. (Hindu Janajagruti Samiti {HJS} is not a branch of Sanatan Sanstha; but it is an independent oragnsiation. Communal tension has been created in Kerala not because of HJS but due to the fanatic jihadi organization called ‘Popular Front of India’. The offices of this organization were raided by the police and bombs and other weapons were confiscated. Ahmad is, however, conveniently keeping quiet about the same ! – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat
  4. On 3rd January 2013, the Central Government had told Mumbai High Court that decision on imposing ban on Sanatan Sanstha would be taken within 45 days; but the decision is still not taken, says Ahmad in the article. (Commenting on matters pending in Court, amounts to contempt of Court. None of the investigating agencies have accused Sanatan Sanstha of being a terrorist organisation. Only few Sanatan-haters are going to Court demanding ban for defaming Sanatan ! – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat)
  5. Sanatan Sanstha is on the hit-list of the Government for its participation in anti-national terrorist activities. Even then, this organization recently celebrated ‘Guru-Pournima’ at Kochi (Kerala). (Every citizen has freedom to abide by his Dharma as per Indian Constitution. Ahmad has no right to criticize on this. – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat) The main speech was given on establishment of Hindu Rashtra. Maharashtra Government and anti-terrorist squad have been demanding ban on Sanatan; but this pro-Hindu terrorist organization held program openly giving such warning, was the grief expressed by Ahmad in this article. (Will Ahmad write about guidance given through madarasas and mosques? – Editor, Dainik Sanatan Prabhat)

Source : Dainik Sanatan Prabhat

Leave a Comment

Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of HJS and HJS is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​