US Federal Court issues ruling in favor of Swami Nithyananda

Bhadrapad Krushnapaksha Trutiya,Kaliyug Varsha 5116

US Federal Court issues ruling in favor of Swami Nithyananda, confirming the conspiracy theory against him

False claims levied by Rao against Nithyananda, combined with her incessant statements of Nithyananda followers of being “brainwashed” and also “cult” members caused immense and irreparable damages to NDC.
                                                                                              – U.S. Federal Court

Ohio, USA : The United States District Court Southern District Of Ohio issued a judgment against Mrs. Aarthi S. Rao and in favor Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of Columbus in Delaware, Ohio (NDC). The order states, “It is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant Rao, in the amount of Four Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars ($463,211.25), plus attorney’s fees ($10,568.30), plus costs ($603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum.”

Further, the court also found “The allegations contained in Plaintiff’s Complaint are deemed admitted as true against Defendant.” The complaint against Rao was based on Rao’s defamatory acts, including but not limited to false rape and abuse claims against H.H. Paramahamsa  Nithyananda, the spiritual head of NDC, and her role in the morphing of the false video of  purportedly Nithyananda.  These false claims levied by Rao against Nithyananda, combined with her incessant statements of Nithyananda followers of being “brainwashed” and also “cult” members caused immense and irreparable damages to NDC.

 

 

 

Excerpts of the complaint showing the false charges alleged by Aarthi Rao in this default judgment case:

 

 

 

Source : Nithyananda.Org

1 thought on “US Federal Court issues ruling in favor of Swami Nithyananda”

  1. First of all, hearty congratulations to Nithyanand Ji on his righteous victory. Thanks also for HJS for publishing this legal verdict.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of HJS and HJS is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​